Legal Opinion

Mays v. Prewett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

EROM 'WILLIAMSON.. Appeal from Chancery Court of Williamson County. Thomas H. Malone, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The real litigation in this case is evolved from the allegations of the cross bill. The original bill was filed by F. H. Mays against the defendants for the foreclosure of a mortgage on certain personal property executed to secure the pay*475ment of two notes — -one for $500, and the other for $200. Defendants answered the hill and resisted the collection of the notes, -and by cross bill sought to have said notes, with two other notes for $500 each, surrendered up to be canceled. The allegations of the cross bill are, that on the eighth of August, 1894, J. C. Prewett and wife conveyed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seat v. McWhirterTennessee Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Conservatorship of GrovesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  2. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Williamson v. UpchurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. Whitchurch v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  5. Pan-Am Southern Corp. v. CumminsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API