Legal Opinion

Wilkey v. Hull

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 3, 2009No. 2:07-cv-00160PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 67) Plaintiff opposes the motion (Doc. 70) and Defendants have replied. (Doc. 75)

Both parties filed voluminous pleadings along with a large number of exhibits. 1 The Court will not attempt to summarize all of the material in the record, but will discuss the facts and arguments presented as they are relevant to the dispositive issues raised in the motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Dr. Keith Wilkey is an orthopedic surgeon, formerly on the professional staff of the McCullough-Hyde Memorial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAAP Energy, Inc. v. BellDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API