Legal Opinion

Kunnanz v. Edge

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1994No. Civ. 930198PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Ernest and Alouise Kunnanz [Kunnanzes] appeal from a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, dismissing their medical malpractice action against Dr. Stephen Edge. We reverse and remand.

On November 5, 1987, Ernest sought emergency room treatment for what was diagnosed as a kidney stone in his upper ureter. Ernest’s physician, Dr. Charles Swen-sen, sent him to Dr. Edge, a specialist in urology. Dr. Edge recommended an ureter-oseopy, a procedure that inserts an uretero-scope, an instrument resembling a small telescope, through the urethra and bladder into the ureter to remove the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Schulz v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Estate of SerightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Klimple v. BahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GibbsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Barnes v. Mitzel Builders, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gowin v. TrangsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API