Legal Opinion

Uni-Products, Inc. v. Bearse (In Re Uni-Products, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 23, 1993No. 19-41805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On December 21, 1992, the Debtor in Possession (“DIP”) filed a complaint against Ralph A. Bolden and other parties seeking, inter alia, “a determination that the debtor corporation is the proper and valid owner of” a Borg Warner vacuum forming machine, temperature controls, two vacuum tanks, four vacuum pumps and a hydraulic pump (collectively, the “machine”). P. 4 of DIP’s complaint. The DIP filed a motion for summary judgment against Bolden on February 19, 1993. Bol-den answered the motion on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Shindler v. . HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Duke v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Brabin v. . HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alofs Manufacturing Co. v. Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. (In Re Alofs Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  2. G & B Aircraft Management v. Smoot (In Re Utah Aircraft Alliance)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API