Legal Opinion
State v. Guy
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 1968No. 107PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
In his motion for post-conviction relief, defendant alleged that he was “legally insane” at the time he pleaded guilty. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing. Defendant’s appeal raises the following issues: (1) Is competency to plead an issue cognizable under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1967) ? (2) Did defendant’s motion raise the issue? (3) Do the files and records conclusively show that defendant is not entitled to relief?
Competency to Plead as an Issue under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1967).
The conviction of an accused person while he is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- James P. Taylor v. United States of America, James Peter Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- David L. Hansford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BarnettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. HansenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. MaplesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.