Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. State

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1968No. 128PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARMIJO, Judge.

Clarence Hoffman was tried by jury and was convicted of unlawfully issuing a worthless check, and was sentenced. Following his conviction he filed a motion under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953, whereby he sought to have the judgment and sentence set aside on the grounds he was mentally ill at the time the offense was committed and incompetent to stand trial and that he was denied due process. The motion was denied without a hearing.

This appeal follows entry of order denying the motion.

Being indigent appellant was afforded court appointed counsel at all stages of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. UptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. FolkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NobleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. MadrigalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. HollowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. BarefieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. HollowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API