Legal Opinion

Reservation Eleven Associates, a Limited Partnership v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 2, 1969No. 22142_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises over the elements of valuation a jury was allowed to consider in a condemnation proceeding. The appellant, landowner, offered to prove at trial that it had been the practice of the District Commissioners to close alleys upon application, and that the “fair value” of the appellant’s land should have been established by a method that treated the alleys as closed, or likely to be closed. The trial judge rejected the proffer. He felt that the Commissioners of the District of Columbia had the discretion to refuse a request to close an alley, and there…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. James E. Hernandez v. City of LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Potomac Development Corp. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. B. J. Bucheit, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Boyd v. BrownerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API