Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 24, 1950No. 16400PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This action was brought by John F. O’Connor against the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, which has an insurance department incorporated under the laws of Ohio, to recover actual and punitive damages on account of alleged fraud and deceit in inducing him to take out a health and accident insurance policy which was subject to rescission at any time on the ground of false answers contained in the application.

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he truthfully answered all questions concerning' his health propounded to him by the Brotherhood’s soliciting agent, that he informed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. J.B. Colt Company v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Hood v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Frierson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Prince v. State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hooters of America, Inc. v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998
  2. Pitts v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Jones v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Gordon v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Doub v. Weathersby-Breeland Insurance AgencySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API