Legal Opinion

Hood v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1934No. 13873PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

This is an action for damages based upon fraud and deceit alleged to have been practiced upon plaintiff by the defendant company through its agent Catlin.

The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that in March, 1930, she learned that her brother, Ben O. Hood, had with the defendant company a health and accident policy of insurance, in which she was designated as beneficiary, and that he was thinking of discontinuing it; that pursuant to a notice sent the insured — which fell into her hands — of the due date of the annual premium, she went…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J.B. Colt Company v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Baldwin v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Crosby v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Williams v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Lillie B. Thomas v. the Amer. WorkmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Gordon v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. O'Connor v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Able v. Equitable Life Assur. Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API