S. F. Bowser & Co. v. McCormack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
Plaintiff, appellant, brought this action to recover ,the balance of the purchase price of a so-called “ oil fountain,” which consisted of a series of storage tanks to be located inside defendants’ service station and connected, by underground pipes, with a structure out of doors, called the fountain, where the oil was drawn near the customer to be served. The storage tanks and the fountain were furnished by the plaintiff, and defendants furnished the piping to connect the tanks with the fountain, and defendants also did the work of installation. Concededly there were no defects in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Matter of Casualty Co. (Bliss Co. Claim)New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Cohan v. MarkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. E. W. Bliss Buildings, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hobart Manufacturing Co. v. RodziewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Torrance v. Durisol, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1956
- Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Davies v. Motor Radio Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Lutz v. Hill-Diesel Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.