Legal Opinion
Matter of Casualty Co. (Bliss Co. Claim)
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The claim sets up a contract between the E. W. Bliss Company and the Santo Manufacturing Company; the execution, by the Casualty Company of America, of a bond in the penal sum of $50,000 for the faithful performance of the contract by Santo Company; the non-performance by Santo Company of its contract undertaking to machine finish a stipulated quantity oforgings for Russian shrapnel shells; the performance by Bliss Company of all obligations imposed upon it by the contract; the incurrence of damages by Bliss Company in excess of $150,000; the institution of liquidation proceedings by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Dolan v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Industralease Automated & Scientific Equipment Corp. v. R. M. E. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Grad v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp. v. Transportation Credit Clearing House, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1969
- Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.