Legal Opinion

Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 18, 1947No. 260, Docket 20555PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff complains that the judge erred in (1) denying its motion for a directed verdict, (2) in his charge to the jury, (3) in refusing some of plaintiff’s requests to charge, and (4) in excluding certain documents. We shall consider these alleged errors in turn.

1. Denial of plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict.

The first question is whether, on the indisputable record facts, plaintiff was entitled to a directed verdict based upon proof of facts creating an express warranty, pursuant to § 93 of the New York Personal Property Law, or an implied warranty, pursuant to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Green v. Reading Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  3. Mondshine v. ShortCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. ZermaniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. Lee v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API