Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Ortiz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 28, 1967No. 67-732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANN, Judge.

This matter comes before us upon the appellant’s motion to review order setting supersedeas pursuant to Rule 5.10, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. The appellant was plaintiff below in an action against his wife for divorce. The defendant-wife counterclaimed for separate maintenance and later amended the counterclaim to seek a divorce.

On June 30, 1967 the chancellor entered an “amended final judgment of divorce,” as well as an order which granted the wife $1209.80 for suit money and $15,000 attorney’s fees, both of which were to be paid on or before July 17, 1967.- (These…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Codomo v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. State ex rel. Royal Insurance v. BarrsSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Orr Ex Rel. Walton v. OrrSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Dorner v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. Ex Rel. FontaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. LammDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Belcher v. BelcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API