Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Royal Insurance v. Barrs
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 21, 1924PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.
In an action brought in the Civil Court of Record for Duval County upon an insurance policy, the plaintiff claiming “the principal of said policy, interest at legal rate and a reasonable attorney’s fee, ’ ’ the following verdict was rendered: “We, the jury, find for the plaintiff and assess its damages at $3000.00 principal, $592.66 interest, and $538.90 attorneys’ fees, total $4131.56.”
A rule was issued from this court requiring the judge of the trial court and the plaintiff below to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not be issued command*170ing the judge not to award judgment in favor…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. NYE Schneider Fowler Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Springstead v. Crawfordsville State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- City of St. Louis v. MeintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Allen v. Estate of DuttonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Shavers v. Duval CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Price v. TylerSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.