Legal Opinion

Orr Ex Rel. Walton v. Orr

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 15, 1939PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit was instituted by appellants on a rule to show cause why appellee should not be adjudged in contempt of court for failure to obey a final decree in an action of divorce adjudicated prior thereto. The relevant facts are briefly stated as follows:

By final decree of January 13, 1937, the court ordered the appellee, Morrison B. Orr, to pay into the registry of the court the sum of $5,500.00 as attorneys’ fees allowed the wife in the divorce suit. (By the order, $500.00 was designated as attorneys’ fees pendente lite already allowed appellants Casey, Walton & Spain, but not yet paid; and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Van Loon v. Van LoonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Everette v. PettewaySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Phelan v. PhelanSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  4. Roper v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. FairclothSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. In the Interest of S. L. T.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Wilkerson v. WilkersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. English v. EnglishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Eddens v. EddensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API