Legal Opinion
Earnest Hammond v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1969No. 22589_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYRNE, District Judge:
Appellant appeals from the judgment of the District Court denying a motion after a hearing, with appellant present, under Title 28, United States Code, section 2255. Appellant was originally convicted of two counts of smuggling and conspiracy to smuggle in violation of Title 21, United States Code, section 174. He duly appealed this judgment of conviction. Hammond v. United States, 356 F.2d 931 (CA 9, 1966).
On the original appeal, appellant urged that the following four alleged errors required reversal. First, the government failed to disclose an informant who alerted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alejandrino Diaz-Rosendo and Felix Anenson Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. MarcheseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Marvin Delane White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Juan Jose Medrano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ernest Hammond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Francisco S.A. Ignacio and Antonio S.A. Ignacio v. People of the Territory of GuamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Howard v. DaggettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- David W. Olney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Jeffers v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1978
- Charles Joseph Battaglia, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.