Charles Joseph Battaglia, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted, in a non-jury trial, on a charge of violating the Hobbs “Anti-Racketeering” Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. After his conviction was affirmed, Battaglia v. United States, 383 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1967), and his petition for certiorari denied, 390 U.S. 907, 88 S.Ct. 817, 19 L.Ed.2d 874 (1968), he moved to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Relief was sought on the ground that he was under the influence of drugs at the time of trial, and, consequently, unable to understand the charges against him or to meaningfully cooperate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Henry v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Anthony Mirra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roy Justin v. Louis JacobsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Philip MilestoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Howard v. DaggettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- William Bernard McKinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Jonathan TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.