Legal Opinion

Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 7, 1924No. 1621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appellee secured registration of the , mark “Fig-Nuts” under the provisions of the Trade-Mark Act of March 19, 1920 (41 Stat. 533 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 9516a et seq.]), and in this proceeding, based upon section 2 of that act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 9516b), it is sought to cáncel the registration.

In U. S. Compression Inner Tube Co. v. Climax Rubber Co., 53 App. D. C. 370, 290 Fed. 345, we ruled that the act in question contains no provision for appeal to this court, and hence that we are without jurisdiction to consider one.

It results that this appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Compression Inner Tube Co v. Climax Rubber Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Automatic Washer Co. v. Easy Washing MacHine Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1951
  2. Macleay Duff (Distillers), Ltd. v. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. Postum Cereal Co. v. Farmers' Mill & Elevator Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API