Legal Opinion

United States Compression Inner Tube Co v. Climax Rubber Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 1923No. 1579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, sustaining a petition for cancellation of a trade-mark registered by appellant, United States Compression Inner Tube Company, under the Act of Congress of March 19, 1920, 41 Stat. 533.

We are confronted with a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that appeal does not lie to this court from the decision of the Commissioner in cases arising under the 1920 act. The purpose of the act, as stated in the title, is:

“To give effect, to certain provisions of tbe convention for tbe protection of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Macleay Duff (Distillers), Ltd. v. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  4. In re Railley Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API