Legal Opinion

United States v. Cora Marie Artus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1979No. 78-1626PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Cora Marie Artus appeals her conviction of escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751. On appeal she contends that her conviction by jury verdict was the result of prejudicial prosecutorial and judicial misconduct. The contention has merit and, accordingly, we reverse.

In March of 1977, Artus was released to a halfway house, a contract facility of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in Santa Barbara, California. On October 8, 1977, a facility counselor formally cited her for two rule violations. She was scheduled to appear for a disciplinary hearing on these violations on October 12, 1977, but was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Sam J. SchorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Raymond Nelson LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Curtis Ray MichelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Richard S. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Pineda-DovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Dixon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API