Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard S. Berry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1980No. 13-35322PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The court’s opinion filed on July 7,1980 is withdrawn and the following Amended Opinion is substituted.
Berry argues that his conviction for conspiracy to commit fraud should be reversed because (1) the Arizona District’s jury selection system improperly excluded Indians and (2) the cumulative effect of several errors and instances of prosecutorial misconduct prejudiced him and foreclosed his right to a fair trial. We reject both arguments and affirm the conviction.
Berry was indicted for offenses related to perjury and the obstruction of justice by a grand jury selected…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Julio C. Valle-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Wayne FREDERICK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.