Legal Opinion

Keasey v. Mitzel Brothers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1939No. Appeal, 7PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation ease the referee and board found for the claimant and on appeal a court of common pleas entered judgment in his favor. The question involved is whether the claimant was injured while in the course of his employment with the defendants. We conclude that he was. This is one of those cases in which liability for compensation arises by reason of the peculiar circumstances and combination of facts present and in which precedents dealing with course of employment and casual employment are of little aid.

The complainant for a period of twelve years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Smedley v. Frank & Seder Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Zapos v. DemasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Bowser v. Milliron Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Gibson v. Blowers Paint ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Keene v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Taylor v. EwingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Taylor v. EWINGSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API