Legal Opinion

Walk v. Boudheim

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFmtz, J.

Upon this appeal the first question to consider is whether the court erred in substituting for a jury’s finding to the contrary, its finding that Emily Boudheim was negligent in respect to lookout and control in operating an automobile truck which collided with plaintiff’s wagon on December 1, 1934. On this appeal, the question is not whether the trial judge’s findings are more warranted by the evidence than those which were returned by the jury in their verdict, but is solely whether there is any credible evidence which admits of inferences that will sustain, under any reasonable view, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Byerly v. ThorpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Joyce v. BrockettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Joyce v. . BrockettNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nettleton v. JAMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Phillips v. DELTA MOTOR LINES, INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ross v. TynesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Anderson v. London Guarantee Accident Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Peters v. RieckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API