Legal Opinion

Byerly v. Thorpe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed February 4, 1936:

Fritz, J.

The trial court erred in overruling the insur- . anee carrier’s plea in abatement.

The defendant, Charles W. Thorpe, was driving the automobile which was involved in the collision that resulted in injuries to the plaintiff, Alma Byerly, with the consent of its owner, B. E. Thorpe. He was a resident of the state of Illinois, and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company’s policy, upon which plaintiffs seek to recover, was written *30and issued in that state upon an automobile kept, licensed, and usually operated therein. That policy had a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seligman v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Morgan v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Pawlowski v. EskofskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Morey v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Oertel v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ritterbusch v. SexmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cox v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. Bourestom v. BourestomWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kilcoyne v. TrauschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Foellmi v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API