Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sadler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1982No. 2456PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from an order arresting judgment, the Commonwealth contends that the lower court erred in holding that appellee had not been timely tried. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the lower court and remand for disposition of appellee’s remaining post-trial motions.1

On June 6, 1978 appellee, then fifteen years old, committed the instant robbery and an unrelated robbery. He was arrested for the present offense on July 18, 1978. The Commonwealth filed a juvenile delinquency petition, and subsequently notified appellee it would seek to certify him to stand trial as an adult in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. OliverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. LuxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Sadler v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. In the Interest of MellottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API