Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Mellott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1984No. 82PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Randy Scott Mellott, a sixteen year old juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent because of a tragic hunting accident in which he accidentally shot and killed another hunter whom he momentarily and mistakenly believed to be a wild turkey. On appeal, he contends that his adjudication hearing was held in violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. He also contends that an incriminating statement made by him to a deputy game warden, as well as the offending shotgun, should have been suppressed.

Appellant’s first contention is lacking in merit. Rule 1100 does not apply to juvenile proceedings.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. SeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. In the Interest of V. H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Com. v. Lawrence, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. In re B.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. In re F.Z., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API