Mainster v. West Bloomfield Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.
Before the present action was commenced, plaintiffs had sought to have their property in West Bloomfield Township rezoned from R-15, residential, to 0-1, office buildings. This change in zoning was desired because plaintiff Harris W. Mainster, a doctor, had offered to purchase the property, subject to rezoning, for use as an office or clinic. The defendant township’s board, however, denied this request. The plaintiffs then brought the present action to challenge the validity of defendant’s zoning ordinances as they were applied to plaintiffs’ property. At the close of plaintiffs’ proofs, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Attorney General v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Taber v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Lansing v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Morrison v. City of East LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Keiswetter v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983