Attorney General v. Rice
Michigan Supreme Court
Information to determine the right of respondent to hold the office of supervisor. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The Attorney General files an information in this case to determine the right of the respondent to hold the office of supervisor of the township of Iron wood in the county of Ontonagon.
The Legislature of 1885, by Act No. 382 (local acts), organized certain territory in Ontonagon county into a township,, to be called Ironwood.
At an election held pursuant to the provisions of said act, *387on tbe sixth day of July, 1885, the respondent was elected supervisor of said township, and duly qualified, and entered upon the duties of his office. No election was held in said township in the spring of 1886,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Supervisors of Schuyler County v. People ex rel. Rock Island & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Happel v. BrethauerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Pack v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by49 opinions
- Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Weldon v. ThomasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Milwaukee County v. IsenringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. HestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. McElroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.