Legal Opinion

Ruizgarcia v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 23, 2002No. 01-478CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILSON, Judge.

This military pay action is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted1 and plaintiffs motions for summary judgment and discovery. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is GRANTED and plaintiffs motions are DENIED.

BACKGROUND

On February 1, 1993, plaintiff voluntarily enlisted in the United States Marine Corps for an eight-year term, comprised of four years of active duty and four years of inactive reserve duty. In August 1996, plaintiff was charged with violating the Uniform Code…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Barnick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Lohman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API