Legal Opinion
Barnick v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 27, 2008No. 04-1676CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The plaintiff, Ronald S. Barnick (“plaintiff” or “Barnick”), filed this action seeking review of the decisions of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“AFBCMR”), and for monetary damages for loss of military pay and benefits, as well as other monetary and non-monetary relief. The defendant, the United States (“defendant” or “government”), has moved to dismiss some of Mr. Barnick’s claims under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) on the grounds that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over such…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Volk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Morris Shelkofsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Barna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Deemer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.