Johnson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, P. J.:
Plaintiff, W. Percival Johnson, has brought this action against defendants Roy V. Jackson and E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as duPont, to recover for injuries allegedly suffered by the plaintiff due to the alleged negligence of the defendants.
duPont, pursuant to Rule 56, Del. C. Ann. has moved for summary judgment in its favor on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and, therefore, duPont is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
The plaintiff has alleged that he was injured when Jackson, as he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Eyerly v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Draper v. Olivere Paving & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Miceli v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Decker v. MannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. Joma, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Johnson v. EI duPONT deNEMOURS & COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962