Legal Opinion

Miceli v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1956No. 29379PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Judge.

In this action for personal injuries, defendant Arthur Cheeks, although having filed an answer, defaulted, and made no appearance at the trial. The parties waived a jury, and the cause was tried before the court. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, Williams moved for a judgment and stood thereon. In time the motion for judgment was overruled, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and against both defendants for $3,000. Defendant Williams has appealed, and contends that the judgment cannot stand because: (1) the evidence failed to establish that Arthur Cheeks…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Fulton v. City of LockwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Scott v. KemplandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Wines v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. HarmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. De Mariano v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Lee J. GovroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. Rosser v. Standard Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API