Wilson v. Joma, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
We address the so-called “dual purpose” rule regarding the potential liability of an employer for the off premises tortious acts of an employee during a lunch hour. The Superior Court granted summary judgment to the defendant Joma, Inc., holding that when the plaintiff, Carl L. Wilson, was injured by a Joma employee during the latter’s lunch break, the employee was not acting within the course and scope of his employment. Because we conclude that there are material disputes of fact on this issue, the judgment of the Superior Court must be reversed.
I
James DeMaio was a full-time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Vanaman Ex Rel. Vanaman v. Milford Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Continental Oil Company v. Pauley Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Best Steel Buildings, Inc. v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fisher v. Townsends, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Empire of America Relocation Services, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Hecksher v. Fairwinds Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Elmer v. Tenneco Resins, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Sherman v. Del. Dep't of Pub. SafetySupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.