Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Karasek

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 2, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2121PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

The question presented on this appeal is whether a policy owner’s recovery under an uninsured motorist provision may be reduced by the amount of workmen’s compensation benefits paid to the injured policy owner.

The plaintiff-appellee filed a declaratory judgment action against his insurer, State Farm seeking a judgment that he was entitled to compensation under the uninsured motorist provisions of his policy. He had been injured by an uninsured motorist while operating a motorcycle in the course and scope of his employment as a City of Phoenix patrolman. The policy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Allied Mutual Insurance Company v. LarrivaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Montedoro v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Adams v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Travelers Insurance v. BreeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API