State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Karasek
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether a policy owner’s recovery under an uninsured motorist provision may be reduced by the amount of workmen’s compensation benefits paid to the injured policy owner.
The plaintiff-appellee filed a declaratory judgment action against his insurer, State Farm seeking a judgment that he was entitled to compensation under the uninsured motorist provisions of his policy. He had been injured by an uninsured motorist while operating a motorcycle in the course and scope of his employment as a City of Phoenix patrolman. The policy…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Allied Mutual Insurance Company v. LarrivaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
3Cited by17 opinions
- Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Montedoro v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. BangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Adams v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Travelers Insurance v. BreeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.