Legal Opinion
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 29, 1989No. 88-2211PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, requests that we set aside three actions taken by the respondents, the United States and the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (collectively, NRC or Commission), with respect to the operation of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim) by the Boston Edison Company (Edison), which is an intervenor in this action. NRC and Edison moved to dismiss the petition on jurisdictional grounds. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petition; we do not dismiss it on jurisdictional grounds.
I. FACTS
In 1972, Edison was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Morris v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Beyond Nuclear v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Kelley v. SelinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.