People v. Farrell
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
In this case, we address the issue of whether the trial court properly admitted a co-defendant's statement against interest in the case against Defendant Antonio Farrell. The trial court ruled that the co-defendant's confession was reliable and accordingly admitted it into evidence in a redacted form that omitted certain portions of the statement it found to be prejudicial. In People v. Farrell, 10 P.3d 672 (Colo.App.2000), the court of appeals reversed the trial court's ruling, concluding that the statement did not possess the particularized guarantees of trustworthiness necessary to justify…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ralph Rodney Earnest v. Donald Dorsey, Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. FrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. WelshColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.