Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Town of Carmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 10, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from continuing to divert water, silt, and other materials onto the plaintiffs’ property by artificial means, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated May 27, 1999, as granted the cross motion of the defendant Town of Carmel to dismiss the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the cross motion which was to dismiss…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. Town of ShandakenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. American Pen Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Picciano v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Thoma v. Town of SchodackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Palmieri v. Village of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Andrusz v. Town of LancasterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Carbonaro v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API