Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 1974No. [No. 36, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

The appellants Miriam H. Goldstein and Irving L. Goldstein, as tenants by the entirety, on the one hand, and the appellants Betty Lee Hoffman and Sidney Hoffman, as tenants by the entirety, on the other, each own an undivided one-half interest in a tract of 1.99 acres located on what until 1964 was Russell Street, in an industrial area of Baltimore. For purposes of this opinion, the Goldsteins and the Hoffmans will be referred to collectively as the Owners.

In 1964, construction of the Russell Street Viaduct Extension (the Viaduct), which was built to link the Baltimore-Washington Parkway to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Mayor of Cumberland v. WillisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  5. Turner v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harford County People's Counsel v. BEL AIR REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. State Roads Commission of State Highway Administration v. BrannonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Perkins v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API