Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1943No. 29578 and 29579PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

In the consolidated returns filed for the year 1939, the taxpayer listed as Ohio taxable credits the sum of $4,745,938, with no claim for any deduction; and in the return filed for the year 1940, $6,104,690 was listed, with no claim for deduction. Taxes were paid computed on such valuations.

(In the stipulation of facts submitted to the Board of Tax Appeals it was agreed, provided the same were determined to be relevant and material, that if a foreign situs were .accorded the accounts receivable of the Procter & Gamble Distributing Company’s district offices outside Ohio, the Ohio taxable…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haverfield Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. National Distillers Products Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Baldwin Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Sparks-Withington Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API