Legal Opinion

Baldwin Co. v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1947No. 30729PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The precise question presented is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was unreasonable or unlawful wherein it held that all business done by the appellant was Ohio business and that all of appellant’s accounts receivable should be given an Ohio situs.

The method of computing the franchise tax of an Ohio corporation is set forth in Section 5498, General-Code. The computation involves a determination of the amount and value of business done by the corporation in Ohio as compared with the total amount and value of business done by the corporation and also the fair value of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ransom & Randolph Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cliffs Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Haverfield Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. International Harvester Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API