National Distillers Products Corp. v. Glander
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
These cases were presented together for the reason that all five of them involve similar questions of situs under the provisions of Sections 5328-1 and 5328-2, General Code.
These and cognate provisions have been discussed and applied in many recent decisions by this court. Aluminum Co. of America v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 140 Ohio St., 385, 45 N. E. (2d), 118; Procter & Gamble Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 142 Ohio St., 369, 52 N. E. (2d), 517; Ransom & Randolph Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 142 Ohio St., 398, 52 N. E. (2d), 738; Haverfield Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 143 Ohio St., 58, 54 N.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ransom & Randolph Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Aluminum Co. of America v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- C. F. Kettering, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Haverfield Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- National Cash Register Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. GlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. GlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. PeckOhio Supreme Court · 1954
- Hoover Co. v. PeckOhio Supreme Court · 1953