Legal Opinion

Pooler v. Grasselli Chemical Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1940No. Appeal, 78PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldrige, J.,

Opinion by

This appeal in a workmen’s compensation case is from a decree of the court below striking off a judgment entered for claimant under an open agreement. The reason assigned by the learned court for its action was that the agreement had apparently been executed less than ten days after the alleged injury in violation of section 407 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended, 77 PS § 731.

We concur with the conclusion that the judgment is invalid, but for a different reason, which we will state later, than that assigned by the court of common…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Kessler v. North Side Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Gardner v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Furman v. Standard P. Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Zygmunt v. Copperweld Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pooler v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Angelaccio v. Kaiser Fleetwings, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Sober v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API