Legal Opinion

Zygmunt v. Copperweld Steel Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1937No. Appeal, 86PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

by Cunningham, J.,

The only legal question involved upon this appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from an order of the compensation authorities reinstating an open agreement for payment to the appellee of compensation for total disability, following an accident suffered by him in the course of his employment with appellants, is whether there was sufficient legally competent evidence to support the order. The uncontroverted facts may be thus summarized: Claimant, forty-eight years of age, had been in the employ of the steel company since 1926, and worked steadily up to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Kessler v. North Side Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Krock v. Ballard Sprague & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Horwath v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tomshuck v. Wallin Concrete Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Angelaccio v. Kaiser Fleetwings, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Pooler v. Grasselli Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API