Thompson v. Poirier
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case raises questions whether the defendants constructively evicted the plaintiff from certain leased business premises, whether the corporate plaintiff is a proper party to the action, and whether the court below acted properly in awarding the plaintiff moving expenses, lost profits and attorney fees.
Frank Thompson and Russell Poirier owned and operated separate sign-painting and manufacturing businesses in the Hooksett area. In December 1973 the two agreed that Mr. Poirier, who owned Whitey’s Signs, would construct on his business premises a building suitable to house Mr. Thompson’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Westland Housing Corp. v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Spectrum Enterprises, Inc. v. Helm Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Wade v. HerndlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Micro Data Base Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Dharma Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Echo Consulting Services, Inc. v. North Conway BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Stevan v. BrownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Clinical Lab Products, Inc. v. MartinaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Norberg v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.