Burridge v. Studebaker Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Assumpsit by Charles W. Burridge against the . Studebaker Corporation for commissions on the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff sued defendant for commissions he claimed he had earned resulting from a sale of real estate by the defendant. At the close of the testimony the defendant made a motion to direct a verdict against the plaintiff, which motion was overruled. The case was submitted to the jury and a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $1,028.12 was returned. The defendant moved the court to enter judgment in its favor non obstante veredicto, which motion, was denied. Later a motion for a new trial was made and denied. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The relations between…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Brooks v. LeathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Gilmore v. BolioMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- McDonald v. BœingMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Lerner v. HarveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1915