Legal Opinion

Scott v. Alabama MacHinery and Supply Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 3, 1974No. Civ. 261PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

BRADLEY, Judge.

On rehearing, the original opinion in this case is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor as the opinion of the court.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

Petitioner, Eddie Scott, filed an action against respondent, Alabama Machinery and Supply Company, in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County to recover benefits authorized by the workmen’s compensation laws of Alabama, i. e., Title 26, Section 253 et seq., Code of Alabama 1940, as Recompiled 1958, and as amended. After trial without a jury, the court found Scott was temporarily totally disabled and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Tiger Motor Company v. WinslettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Profitt v. DeAtley-Overman, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Teems v. American Mutual Liability Ins.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Gulf States Steel Co. v. CrossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mike Makemson Logging v. ColburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Elbert Greeson Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. IveyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Lewis G. Reed & Sons, Inc. v. WimbleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Cerrock Wire and Cable Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Health Care Auth. of Huntsville v. HenryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API