Legal Opinion

Profitt v. DeAtley-Overman, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1963No. 9333PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Claimant-appellant is herein sometimes designated as the claimant, and the Industrial Accident Board as the Board.

The principal issue in this proceeding is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain an order of the Board suspending payment of compensation benefits to claimant under authority of I.C. § 72-401, because of his refusal to submit to medical examinations in order thereby to determine the condition which afflicts him and its probable cause, and to determine such further rights as he may have in the premises.

Claimant suffered a low back injury on June S, 1961,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Devlin Ex Rel. Devlin v. EnnisIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Flasche v. Bunker Hill CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Robinson v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Nitkey v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Linzy v. Cameron's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dawson v. HartwickIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re HaynesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Haynes v. J. E. Hall Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kern v. SharkIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API