Legal Opinion

Health Care Auth. of Huntsville v. Henry

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1992No. 2910027PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edna Henry (employee) brought this workmen's compensation action against the Health Care Authority of the City of Huntsville, d/b/a Huntsville Hospital (employer), to recover benefits for injuries sustained in an accident which allegedly occurred during her employment. The trial court found that the employee is permanently and totally disabled within the meaning of the workmen's compensation laws. The employer appeals. We affirm.

At the outset we note that the standard of review in workmen's compensation cases is a two-step process. This court first must determine if any legal evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Scott v. Alabama MacHinery and Supply Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  3. Cerrock Wire and Cable Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Whitehead Forest Products v. HugginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Fort James Operating Co. v. KirklewskiCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Saad's Healthcare Services, Inc. v. MeinhardtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Meinhardt v. SAAD'S HEALTHCARE SERVICESCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API