Sadek v. Nashville Recycling Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff has appealed from a directed verdict and judgment dismissing his suit against the captioned defendants for malicious prosecution.
The only issue presented on appeal is the correctness of the directed verdict.
Plaintiff and the defendant, Nashville Recycling Company, are competitors in the business of recycling used cooking fat obtained from restaurants and other large users of cooking fat. Defendants, Mark Sheridan and Wayne Adams are officers of Nashville Recycling Company.
In general, the method of operation of recyclers is to negotiate an agreement…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Daniels v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Moon v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
- Bowers v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Miller v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
3Cited by20 opinions
- Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Ogle v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Ginn v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Stooksbury v. American National Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.