Legal Opinion

Sadek v. Nashville Recycling Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 9, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff has appealed from a directed verdict and judgment dismissing his suit against the captioned defendants for malicious prosecution.

The only issue presented on appeal is the correctness of the directed verdict.

Plaintiff and the defendant, Nashville Recycling Company, are competitors in the business of recycling used cooking fat obtained from restaurants and other large users of cooking fat. Defendants, Mark Sheridan and Wayne Adams are officers of Nashville Recycling Company.

In general, the method of operation of recyclers is to negotiate an agreement…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Daniels v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  3. Moon v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  4. Bowers v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  5. Miller v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Ogle v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Ginn v. American Heritage Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. Stooksbury v. American National Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API