Legal Opinion

Williams v. Shoudy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1895No. 1816PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.

1Opinion of the Court

*363The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

The appellant is treasurer of Kittitas county, Washington. The respondent being the owner and holder of certain warrants of said county, aggregating the sum of $375, drawn on the general fund and issued for the current expenses of the county during the years 1890 and .1891, all of which had, prior to October 24, 1891, been presented for payment and indorsed, “ not paid for want of funds,” made an application in the lower court for a writ of mandate against the appellant, requiring him to pay said warrants, together with interest thereon at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Mowrer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Seton v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Utah Savings & Trust Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Hodges v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API